The digital humanities component of this course has had a great impact on my learning because I found new ways to express information effectively other than an essay. I learned that not every research project can be best expressed in an essay form. Sometimes, a digital tool like Neatline can be more effective. For my final project in the fall, I had so many sources from different locations and times. In Neatline, I was able to express these sources through the timeline and map. My research had a more holistic representation by then because I was communicating my sources through multiple modes. The learning curve to these digital tools can be quite steep. It was hard to get used to Neatline in the fall. As a consequence, I did not use it for any of my research excursions. Research excursions had a slightly more narrow focus so that contributed to my lack of interest in using Neatline for them. In other words, they had less need for a multimodal approach....
The most unexpected thing about this course was what we read. I could not predict the geographic and temporal diversity we would be exposed to. This made software like Neatline suddenly very accessible and useful. Hayy Ibn Yaqzan was a highlight for me. The first ten pages were so disorienting. I have never felt so hopeless in trying to understand a novel when reading that. Then, I passed over the mountain and eased into the story. I thought it was such a cool idea created by the author. I grew more interested as the man worked his way through logic to reach a greater understanding of the world. When he visited society, I was so surprised at how disappointed he was as well as how far ahead he was in thought. In my own life, I often question whether being in a group or in isolation is the best way to learn a new skill. When learning individually, it seems one can be more creative and innovative because they are not restricted in any way by a ...