I first want to note how good the presentation looks. Compared to Neatline, I find the aesthetics more appealing. I think this software makes better use of gradients and contrast. For example, the grayed-out map with the one selected red point. Even though it looks more like Neatline, I found it to feel way more similar to a PowerPoint presentation when navigating through it. There was a forward arrow and a back arrow, nothing else. You could click on specific things on the map, but I don't think that was the intended design of the presentation. There is also a small map in the top corner that shows the selected area in a more zoomed-out format. This is a cool feature because it reminds you where you are in the world. I found myself sometimes feeling lost in my Neatline presentation because I would be too zoomed in and forget where in the world I was.
Neatline does offer a timeline and sidebar navigation system that StoryMap lacks. I miss these features, but they do not ruin StoryMap for me.
I agree that the software is more appealing and fluid. For me, Neatline was always a little glitchy and finecky. StoryMap moved more precisely. I also prefer how StoryMap presents the text more than Neatline. However, I think Neatline has a more developed map system if your project focuses more on geography. They definitely both have their strengths and situations.
ReplyDeleteHey John! I agree with what you said about how StoryMap almost resembles a PowerPoint presentation with it's user experience elements and slideshow-like navigation tools. I preferred the slideshow format to Neatline. Personally, I prefer the Neatline aesthetics, but agree that the navigation on this site is a little more straightforward.
ReplyDeleteHi John! I also find StoryMap to be a lot smoother than Neatline. The simplicity of just the forward and backward keys while it takes you across the world makes for an engaging and professional looking presentation.
ReplyDelete